The Future of Information Marketing?

by Jason on February 17, 2010

15 years ago, not many people knew how to setup a website. You could charge a lot to do it for someone.

Now, a complete technophobe can create a competent website (plenty competent to get their message out) in about 6 minutes. And they have plenty of choices for how to do it.

4 years ago, not too many people knew how to setup a blog. You could charge a lot to do it for someone.

Now, anyone can do it. My dog could almost do it.

Over time, it seems like the value of certain information is declining at a pretty rapid rate.

So what happens if the very same thing happens to the information marketing business? What if the inherent value of the information starts dropping and becomes more and more difficult to sell outright?

In the past, great marketing is what separated winners from losers. Heck, great marketing could MAKE a business, even if they were selling junk. Marketing did that very thing for many people. I’m talking about the folks who sell high priced information products and then send out photocopied notebooks that look like a 6th grader put them together.

Info Marketing 101: The Value is in the Information

The value is in the information right?

That’s what we’ve all been told in the info marketing business.

But what if the real value was never in the information in the first place?

What if the value was in something else?

What if the real value was simply that most people did not have access to the information. Or because most people didn’t even know that the information existed?

Wouldn’t that make it more valuable all by itself?

So now what happens when so much information is available to so many people from virtually anywhere?

Just how valuable is that information anyway?

Can you sell it? Will anyone buy it?

Sure, marketing can change the perception of your information. It can make it seem more valuable. The packaging alone can make your information more in demand.

But how long will “marketing” produce the sales when the next 10 listings in Google® offer up similar information right NOW, at no cost?

If the main reason information used to be inherently valuable is because it used to be scarce or hard to get, then how can an information business be valuable today - in an age where information is everywhere?

Is there anything left that’s scarce, that could provide value?

Yup.

Real CONNECTIONS With Other Human Beings

Don’t worry. This post is not about to get all mushy and turn into a Web 2.0 love fest. That’s been done already.

But now that the shine and the glitz of the web and of web 2.0 are wearing off, we’re left with all we really have - which is connections with other human beings.

But just because you have to CONNECT and build a relationship, doesn’t mean that relationship has to be between 2 people.

Let’s look at 37signals®.

Those guys have great products. They have products that are SO great (and so simple) that people even make up excuses to use them.

“Well, if we used Basecamp, we could do X, Y and Z… And if we signed up for Backpack, well then we could do X, Y and Z… Dang it, let’s just sign up for all of them. I’m sure we can use them somewhere.”

37signals® is excellent at creating a relationship between their people and their products.

There is a huge amount of value there.

Business on the web is slowly reverting back to be a whole lot like business in the village. The style of business where you went to Bob, the shoe cobbler, because you knew Bob. And you trusted him. And he treated you well.

Except now, Bob could live in India and you could live in Hawaii.

In the village, Bob didn’t try to milk you for every last dime you had. And he didn’t ask you to buy something every day of your life.

Bob knew that’s not how you treat people. And he also knew that if he did that, you wouldn’t come back.

Plus, people would talk about him. About how he doesn’t care about his customers.

Just think of the internet as a connection of thousands of little villages. Villages where people share stories and experiences.

But Does Old School Direct Marketing Work in the Village?

Old school direct marketing is focused on creating leads and/or sales. It hasn’t really been focused on creating relationships and connecting people.

At least I’ve never heard any direct marketing expert or book say, “Let’s just send this out… it’ll help build a strong relationship. Let’s just send this because we care about our people.”

I’m sure it happens, I just haven’t seen it.

After all, how do you measure that?

But can you imagine our friend Bob in the village, walking around thinking about how he can place a killer 2 step ad in the village newspaper and then follow up with a salesletter to close the deal?

That’s just not how selling works when you are in a village. It’s too cold and impersonal. It’s not effective.

And it’s missing the most important ingredient: the relationship.

Instead, Bob does great work.

Instead, Bob gets to know people.

He asks about their kids. About how they’re doing.

The relationships Bob creates do his selling for him. The relationship IS his marketing.

Will Focusing on the Relationship HURT Your Sales?

There’s just one problem. Especially for any entrepreneur that wants to hit it big.

In the village, I’d bet that Bob never became a millionaire. He didn’t really have the tools to do that.

Bob couldn’t really scale his relationship building.

And he couldn’t really scale his caring.

His market was pretty much defined for him, because it stopped at the village wall.

Online, we no longer have those limits.

So how do you scale relationship building?

How do you scale caring?

How much is a relationship or caring worth anyway?

No one has ONE answer for that.

No one has a COURSE for that. A relationship isn’t something that can be “duplicated.”

This is the business frontier we’re on right now. The people that figure that out how to build and scale relationships in their own way for their own business are going to do very, very well.

So isn’t that the hard work we should be doing? Figuring all that out… how to do it for our businesses?

And as quickly as possible?

Isn’t that more important to the long term future of our business than spending so much time searching for the hottest new place to advertise, or the cutting edge technique to get a better click through rate?

After all, no one can copy a relationship.

Because relationships are unique.

And no one can really put a price tag on one either.

Because relationships are valuable.

And unique value is something customers will gladly pay for. They always have.

Bookmark and Share

Related posts:

  1. Will Selling With Video Hurt Your Future Sales?
  • In the village like Hillary Clinton's village? Direct marketing principles still work very well. They are timeless.
  • Denver_Marketing_Consultant
    Someone figured out how to scale relationship...Gary Vaynerchuk.
    Unfortunately, um, duplicability is definitely a problem in his 1:800,000 relationship model.
  • Great post! But in the virtual village, how do you FIND Bob?
  • leistermg
    Hey Catherine,

    Thanks for the comment! In the village, it's easy to find Bob, because there's only ONE Bob.

    I think that's the new goal. To BE the ONLY "Bob" in your village...
  • But you have to know Bob exists before you can look for him. The first mass-media advertising had the purpose of letting consumers know that there was a product available that they'd want. Don't you still have to do a certain amount of that? There's no point being Bob if no-one knows that Bob exists...
  • leistermg
    Well, I think you still have to work at it.

    But it's easier than ever to get "noticed" if you're someone like Bob in the village (meaning you're "one of a kind").

    It's also easier than ever to FIND your village as well, in the case that they don't know about you yet.

    If you're not unique (or can't articulate it effectively enough, which has often been my problem :) , then I guess you just end up shouting with everyone else. All the folks who haven't yet figured out what they bring to the table but are marketing themselves anyway. And I know that's a hard road to walk.

    But you're right, you still have to get out there and let people know you're alive.
  • AWESOME post. In a recent discussion on Triiibes.com, I asked similar questions about tribe building.

    1. Caring, empathy and making tribe members feel they matter is possible with 'personal tribes' - ones that develop around a leader. How about 'cause based tribes'? Who takes on the mantle of caring there?

    2. Caring in a 'personal' way takes time. And energy. Both are limited, for any individual. Is this 'outsource-able'? Or 'cut-and-paste' template-able? How?

    3. Like trust, this can be a very nebulous, fragile and easily destroyed feeling. Must a tribe's future hinge on that alone? Or are there more sturdy, reliable, indestructible alternatives?

    Many more questions cropped up in the discussion, but the important ones (and the most profitable to answer) are to do with relationship building.

    Excellent post, Jason. I hope you'll explore the HOW in future ones!

    All success
    Dr.Mani
  • An excellent, thoughtful post. I don't think we can avoid this process (nor should we; it strikes me as a vast improvement and we should welcome it) but I'm not sure that it will turn out to be scalable in the sense that people always seem to be looking for now. I think that trying to maintain the kind of relationship you're talking about with too many people will automatically dilute those relationships... and the advantage will be with people running a smaller show and providing more value and quality within a smaller base of clients/customers/villagers/whatever. All of which means, perhaps it's really not going to be possible, in this new economy, to build billion-dollar empires... and maybe that's also a good thing. What if we had more people doing well, instead of increasing income polarization? Would that be so terrible?
  • leistermg
    Tobias,

    I think that's right.

    The market is fragmenting. The number of markets is increasing and the size of them is definitely smaller.

    I guess it's kind of like the transition from network TV to what we have today.

    Back in the 60s, there were a LOT of people watching a very few stations. So it was easy to spread an idea to the masses and have everyone talking about it at work the next day.

    It was also probably easier to make a lot of money this way.

    These days, more SMALLER audiences watch the many different channels that are available.

    People have more in common with those who share similar interests, but they have less to talk about with the random stranger on the street.

    Plus, when did an "empire" ever turn out to be healthy in the long run :)

    Thanks for reading!
  • Hi Jason,

    You make a lot of great points here. But to say that "old school" direct marketing doesn't try to foster relationships....I don't know about that. When you say "old school" do you mean Dan Kennedy "old"?

    Marketing, whether it is direct mail, face to face, online or any other platform is and has always been about making and retaining connections. After all, what good is a lead if you can't foster that connection into a lifetime customer? And in order for that to happen, you need to make a connection and then stay connected.

    I would think that almost all marketers understand that retaining a customer is much cheaper than finding a new one.

    Just my thoughts though.
  • leistermg
    Hey Leo,

    That's a great point. What I meant was that so many of the direct marketing businesses I've come in contact with treat the PEOPLE more like numbers. They appear on spreadsheets and reports and are referred to with names like "leads" etc.

    My point is that now we have tools to market to Bob, Mary, Joe and Suzy as people. We can build the relationship first... in spite of any immediate sale.

    I don't think you'd hear a direct marketing firm say something like, "Let's send this out to build the relationship."

    They usually send stuff out to create a lead, create a customer, or sell something else to an existing customer.

    The technology and tools we have now help us communicate with the individual. Joe can send out a tweet or submit a comment and we can respond. And building those relationships (which require some sweat equity) in spite of immediate sales, can really pay off in the long run.

    Joe feels important because he can have a voice as our customer.

    We can respond to all those individual voices and strengthen the relationship, or we can ignore them and go on with business.

    I think we have the tools we need now to change how business can be done. And I think the businesses that do that are going to excel in the coming years online.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Why You Can’t Make YourSELF an Authority

Next post: Banking is Broken